U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Jena Griswold
60%
60%
40%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Alexis King
(D) Brian Mason
40%
40%
30%
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) George Stern
(D) A. Gonzalez
(R) Sheri Davis
40%
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%
30%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(D) Joe Salazar
50%
40%
40%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
January 14, 2009 03:10 AM UTC
15 Comments
and his constituents know about it, this guy is toast when he comes up for re-election.
http://wonkette.com/405417/ten…
and re: the point of redstateblues:
Sounds like the Democrats rolled over and elected themselves a Republican Speaker.
I guess that’s a great victory to anyone who looks up to Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi.
To me? Well, not so much.
good point!
Would have tried to flip one Republican vote and get a speaker of their own.
Only Democrats would engage in a circle jerk like this.
And the righties still don’t get it.
I’m with you, I take this as someone who does not want to see the GOP dragged off into wingnutville.
Stop the presses…
Seriously – although I don’t agree with Republicans on a lot of things, I think we need an effective, rational, sane opposition party. Without that, the Democrats will just run open-loop and smoke-filled-rooms will completely run the show (instead of the 90% that they do now).
Not to mention – I actually have civil libertarian sympathies with the concept of limited government intervention in private lives. I wish one of the major parties would agree with me on that… the Republicans want to monitor who I sleep with (perverts!) and the Democrats want to hand over my Constitutional intellectual property rights to the highest bidder (toadies!).
The party with the highest potential of being that is actually the Republican party, but they are currently too wrapped around the finger of the
American AyatollahsReligious Right.Just want to know what you’re talking about there…
The Dems are in bed with Hollywood / MPAA / RIAA in extending copyright indefinitely. Disney got their big money adapting public-domain works, and then turned around and got laws passed prohibiting their own works from ever passing into the public domain. And it’s not just Disney.
Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution says, in part:
The Democrats are intent on working with big business media to make that “limited time” effectively unlimited.
Though it’s not like the Republicans were anti-DMCA or against Copyright extension.
There have been a few noises, mostly from the newer Progressive community, on reining in copyright terms, but I wouldn’t count on much.
patent reform has to take front seat there. Copyright reforms would be a welcome tweak once the real problem is handled.
The patent office is now saying no to everything so only the large companies with a staff of attorneys can go through appeal after appeal to get one approved.
It’s gone from a way to protect the little guy to one more way to protect the big corporations.